Showing posts with label Silverstone's Record. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Silverstone's Record. Show all posts

Monday, January 19, 2009

Children Overboard Fiasco: Silverstone's version of events doesn't make sense.


Serious flaws in Silverstone's (on left) secret submission to "Children Overboard" Inquiry.

The Desert Rat knows from the Senate inquiry into the infamous "Children Overboard" fiasco that Brigadier Mike Silverstone made a written submision to the inquiry or tabled written notes of his activities.

We can presume that Silverstone made a request to the Senate Committee to keep the submission or notes secret, because the submission or tabled papers does not appear on the list of public submissions to the Inquiry or tabled papers. Under Senate practice, all submissions and tabled documents are public and listed, except where the person making the submission has asked, and the Committee agreed, to keep it secret.

What we know from material tabled to the inquiry revealed, is that Brigadier Silverstone claimed he had scribbled the word "child" into the notes after the call from Commander Banks. The word "child" replaced "men thrown over side". Silverstone never rang back to Commodore Banks to check that crucial change in the notes of his conversation with Commodore Banks. "Child" we known later blossomed into "children".

We also know that some three or four days later, Silverstone added to his record of the phone conversation to Commodore Banks, a notation of the supposed time of the call (7.20am Darwin time).
The time of this call is in dispute, and importantly, Silverstone's evidence was not challenged on this issue.

This alleged time added days later is important, because the time zone of the HMAS Adeliade was 2 hour and 30 minutes behind Darwin time, that is at 4.50 am.

The HMAS Adelaide logs record the first man overboard after first light at 5.06am followed by further man overboards between 5.43am and 5.56 am - an hour later. This latter time interval was when the fictitious "child overboard" incident supposedly occurred - a whole hour after the time of 7.20am that Silverstone added to his notes.

According to the Senate report transcript page 41:

3.54 According to Brigadier Silverstone, he spoke with Commander Banks at 7.20am Darwin ('India-Kilo') time on 7 October 2001. The time difference between Darwin and the Adelaide was then two and half hours, meaning that, on Brigadier Silverstone's account, the time on the Adelaide ('Golf" time) would have been 4.50am.

It doesn't add-up in the Desert Rat's calculations and it's strange it wasn't challenged by the Labor Senators on the Committee.

In fact, it was dark at 4.50am where the Adelaide was positioned 100 nautical miles north of Christmas Island; due south of Djakarta - some 2800km west of Darwin.

No-one jumps overboard in the dark!


The ALP Senators on the Committee seemed to be preoccupied with nailing the Howard Government and its Ministers - nailing military or naval small fry was a distraction and not politically in their interests - blame needed to be pinned on the Howard Government.

The time of the call was not confirmed by Brigadier Silverstone with Commodore Banks and it was some four week after the incident before Banks was even contacted!

The Desert Rat can not find any record of Silverstone contacting Banks within the following month to clear up the confusion. The rabbit was off and running.

How much did this one phone call fiasco cost Australia and its taxpayers? It all revolved around a disputed conversation between Silverstone and Banks - a conversation that Silverstone version has been proved didn't happen. Did Commander Banks tell a lie or did he get it bizarrely wrong or did Silverstone tell a lie or get it bizarrely wrong?

The political benefit and destruction was all at Silverstone's end of the conversation and should have been confirmed by him in writing immediately - which it wasn't.

Brigadier Mike Silverstone has now retired to the invisible job as the Executive Director of the Corruption and Crime Commission in Western Australia.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Why is Silverstone's Dad's Army swarming with ex-military?


Is oxymoronic taskmaster Mike Silverstone recruiting foot-soldiers for Dad's Army?

A few oxymoron came to mind when the Desert Rat discovered that Donald Barrett the Liberal candidate for the seat of Cockburn in the recent state election, was, prior to the election, an intelligence analyst (oxymoron) with the Crime and Corruption Commission.

Did Donald Barrett ever work for Brigadier Children Overboard Mike Silverstone in the army? Why is the CCC swarming with retired military - army to boot?

Is there real corruption involved in the appointment of staff to the CCC? Does it help to be a retired army serviceman? Does it help to have worked previously for or under Brigadier Mike Silverstone?

Our erstwhile CCC intelligence analyst Barrett must have been a little slow off the mark as he failed to make any headway against Left Faction super-dill Fran "How about a threesome?" Logan. Logan is the Left Faction slug and ALP Member for Cockburn who presided over Western Power board members, public servants and consultants who ripped off Western Power and taxpayers during his oversight of the botched break-up of the utility. He also presided over regular power shortages each summer, the Varanus Island fiasco and couldn't string two coherent sentences together and left us with a dysfunctional government power system. Just as well AlintaGas was privatised because Logan would have stuffed that up as well.

Donald Barrett tells us in the election blurb that he was in the army for 18 years, but says nothing about experience in military intelligence work. His rank isn't given so he was presumably an under achiever or wasn't into self promotion - not something you would expect from a political hopeful.

But then again they are really slow down at the CCC.
Italic
It is an open secret that these retired soldiers are having a working holiday at the CCC. Perhaps they are well suited to "intelligence" work in such massive vacuum or empty space such as the CCC, undertaking government intelligence or military intelligence, whatever it may be. Was Barrett the person who "discovered" the false evidence about Brian Burke and Julian Grill? Or was it the wee beastie who wishes to appear invisible, Mike Silverstone who dreams up the false evidence? The CCC clowns seem to equate military justice with civilian justice - as dispensed by our courts. That's not surprising as CCC supremo Roberts-Smith is a former military Judge Advocate.

We can be thankful that this potpourri of chablis sipping cut-lunch soldiers and amateurs is not running military operations in Afghanistan. Given their performance at the CCC and in the Timor Sea (Children Overboard), they should have remained military retirees.

Saturday, January 3, 2009

"Children Overboard" Mike Silverstone changes the evidence


It's OK for Mr Invisible Mike Silverstone to change his evidence - even when prepared

Wouldn't it be nice if witnesses who were cross examined by the Corruption and Crime Commission on subjects they were not able to prepare for and review information, could fiddle with their evidence or restate it more accurately!

The invisible man, Mike "Children Overboard" Silverstone the Executive Director of the CCC appears to have been quite prepared to extend that privilege to himself according to the Children Overboard enquiry transcripts.

Was this fiddling with the record, just fixing an omission or something more nefarious?

Read this ABC Online report of proceeding of the Senate Inquiry in 2002:

Brigadier admits adding 'child' to notes

The Brigadier who first reported asylum seekers threw their children overboard has revealed he added the word "child" to his notes after he first received information about the incident.

Brigadier Mike Silverstone has given a written submission to the Senate committee investigating the affair.

The Commander of HMAS Adelaide, Norman Banks, has repeatedly denied ever reporting that children had been thrown overboard.

But the man on the other end of that first phone call, Brigadier Silverstone, insists he said it.

The Brigadier says that is supported by his notes of the conversation, even though he has now revealed that the words he recorded during the conversation were "men thrown over side".

He says he added the word child immediately after the conversation and just before he passed the message on to the head of strategic command, Air Vice Marshall Alan Titheridge.

The Senate committee continues its hearings next week."