Shades of the Führer?

The Rancorous Spite of Roberts-Smiths Secular World:
"Do unto others, as you wouldn't have them do unto you."

Every day the CCC looks more like a single party dictatorship based on totalitarian and autocratic ideals. Like the CIA the CCC refuses to confirm or deny the existence of listening devices, hidden camera, email and fax monitoring devices long after the excuse for them has lost credibility.

These devices and software allow the CCC to undertake unrestricted surveillance of their perceived "enemies of the State". Disturbingly, all communication is monitored from love-making to privileged communication between defence lawyers and the CCC's victim. All those involved in the Smith's Beach Inquiry are still being monitored by Dad's Army; Len Roberts-Smith band of overpaid, under-achieving, toadying incompetents.

After 7 years they still do not know if they are being monitored. Even if they defeat the last desperate appeal, we can be sure Roberts-Smith will not inform them that the investigation is at an end. That would be seen as a potential public admission of failure. Despite over $100 million being spent to "expose" assumed corruption associated with the Smith's Beach development (Brian Burke, Julian Grill, David McKenzie; and media manipulation to ensure enough mud (propaganda) has been thrown to destroy their reputation, to soften-up and convince the public that their is no question of innocence, the victims can only assume they are still being spied on by the CCC surveillance machine.

Fiannaca's Appeal against Dismissal of Charges against Grill & Burke

Fiannaca - In Pursuit of Glory or Ignominy?

The conduct of Bruno Fianacca the deputy DPP, has goaded the Desert Rat back into action.

Fiannaca was an important player in the bringing of the CCC corruption charges against Julian Grill and Brian Burke. Fiannaca is central to the current appeals against the dismissal of the recent charges against Grill and Burke, where a Judge Michael Murray a former Crown prosecutor found that the they had "no case to answer".

Fiannaca has a very grubby record of draconian activity in relation to a number of high profile criminal fiasco’s, including the Mallard appeals and the JWRL case among other. He has been an enthusiastic soul mate of the Court Jester Major General Len Robert-Smith.

Just as well this idiot is a lawyer and not a surgeon or nurse where rigour and protocol are critical if you want avoid havoc and destruction and continue to practise those professions.

The need for Fiannaca to feed his massive ego and his incompetent pursuit of position and status beyond his ability, has created unnecessary misery for many honest and innocent citizens of Western Australia.

Fiannaca Record- When Integrity's Absent, Malice Reigns

Fiannaca's Earlier Disgrace

Senior prosecutor denies 'stifling' Mallard appeal

Posted ABC Wed Oct 24, 2007

Prosecutor Bruno Fiannaca has denied trying to stifle Andrew Mallard's murder appeal. (ABC)

A senior prosecutor who contested Andrew Mallard's first attempt to appeal against his murder conviction has denied deliberately stifling efforts by the defence to subpoena material which cast doubt on Mr Mallard's guilt.

Bruno Fiannaca is giving evidence to a Corruption and Crime Commission Inquiry, which is investigating Mr Mallard's wrongful conviction for the 1994 murder of Pamela Lawrence.

The inquiry has heard that in 2002 Mr Fiannaca was asked by the Director of Public Prosecutions Robert Cock to consider a petition to launch an appeal from Mr Mallard's legal team.

Mr Fiannaca said although several aspects of the case had not been disclosed to the jury at trial he advised Mr Cock to oppose the appeal.

He said he was inundated with subpoena requests from Mr Mallard's legal team and at times found their actions unreasonable, but he denied trying to stop their attempts to find information which would have cast doubt over Mr Mallard's guilt.

The inquiry has been shown a report sent to Mr Fiannaca from a British forensic expert confirming that despite the prosecution case at trial, a spanner drawn by Mr Mallard could not have been used to kill Mrs Lawrence.

The report was not provided to Mr Mallard's lawyers until six months after it was written, but Mr Fiannaca has denied "sitting on it", saying he needed to clarify some things and it was always his intention to disclose it.

"Pigs might fly?"

Fiannaca - Misconduct by DDP Prosecutor?

Fiannaca get the biggest Shellacking Ever of a Senior Prosecutor by a Senior Judge

from Crikey.com




13 September 2010
Justice takes a back seat again in WA
by Greg Barns

Last Friday was not a good one for the Western Australian Office of the DPP. Its conduct in a case involving a young man aged 17, who had been given a two-year suspended sentence after being found guilty of a serious assault that resulted in the death of the victim, was described by the Western Australian Chief Justice Wayne Martin as a “a conspicuous departure from appropriate prosecutorial conduct”, and as “patently indefensible”.

The case known as State of WA v JWRL was a high-profile one in Perth. Steven Rowe, a 17-year-old, was killed in 2008 after a fight in a suburban park. Rowe was bashed over the head with a garden stake by the defendant, who cannot be named because he was not 18 at the date of the offence. A widely reported Supreme Court trial in 2009 saw a jury acquit JWRL of murder and manslaughter but find him guilty of assault.

The case was yet another from the West that involved the prosecution failing in its duty to disclose all relevant evidence to the defence. This has been a common theme in a handful of high-profile Western Australian criminal trials over the years — one involving Andrew Mallard, a man wrongfully convicted in 1995 of murder, being the most prominent. Here the DPP’s office received new information from a witness shortly before the trial but did not disclose this to the defence. Chief Justice Martin described the DPP’s office’s conduct as patently unjustifiable and that it was a “conspicuous departure from appropriate prosecutorial conduct”. Of other submissions made in the appeal by the DPP Chief Justice Martin peppered his judgment with words such as “pedantic” and “utterly without foundation”. He described another submission as “extraordinary”.

The DPP’s appeal in this case was argued by one of WA’s most senior prosecutors, Bruno Fiannaca, who has prosecuted former premier Brian Burke and who ironically argued the appeal on behalf of the state against the overturning of Mallard’s conviction by the High Court in 2005. Given the fact that the state’s most senior judge is so relentlessly scathing of the conduct of DPP’s office in the JWRL trial and thought its appeal was without any merit, WA Attorney-General Christian Porter, a former prosecutor himself, might care to ask some very hard questions of the office responsible for running the state’s criminal cases. With the JWRL decision, the roll call of miscarriages of justice in WA just grew by one — and that’s one too many.